What to edit and when in Cochrane reviews. Where to start and when to stop!

Session: 

Workshop session 6: Thursday, 16:00-17:30

Workshop category: 

  • Improving conduct and reporting of syntheses (including teaching and learning)
Status

ID: 

WS48
Date and Location

Date: 

Thursday 14 September 2017 - 16:00 to 17:30

Location: 

Contact persons and facilitators

Contact person:

Facilitators: 

Liz Dooley
Liz Stovold
Anne Littlewood

Acknowledgements:

Royle E1, Dearness K2, Dooley C3
1 Cochrane Collaboration, UK
2 McMaster University, Canada
3 Monash University, Australia
Target audience

Target audience: 

Authors, Editors, Managing Editors, Information Specialists

Level of difficulty: 

Intermediate
Type of workshop

Type of workshop : 

Training
Abstract

Abstract:

Objectives: Participants will gain a better understanding of how to apply editorial checks, relevant to their role, in the production of protocols and reviews.

Description: Through a series of presentations, discussions and hands-on exercises, participants will be walked through the process of editing and be guided by resources and checklists suitable to their needs. This will include resources such as review conduct and reporting standards (MECIR), the Cochrane Style Manual, checklists, bibliographic resources, templates and tools. There will be discussions about reducing duplication of effort by assigning responsibility for editing specific sections of a protocol or review to a particular editorial role (person). Participants will come away with an understanding of what their responsibilities are in terms of editing, and knowing when it is acceptable to stop their task and seek clarification. We will share examples of where submitted drafts do not meet the required standards for editorial approval. This workshop will appeal most directly to anyone involved in editing, including information specialists, managing editors, editors, and authors of reviews.